Newsletters

During these continued uncertain and challenging times, we wanted to connect with our clients to manage expectations and to share important information early in this season. Our team has worked tirelessly over the past 10 months assisting clients through the COVID-19 economic crisis and the 2019 extended filing season. We continue to navigate and interpret guidance as it becomes available to take a proactive and meaningful approach with our clients’ needs. In this, the firm’s 50^th tax season, our commitment to quality remains key in the services we provide. Quality, in these times, coupled with prioritizing the health, safety and well-being of our clients, community, and team members, will take concentrated time and attention to ensure we are doing what is best for each client in light of the sweeping pandemic legislation enacted during 2020, and doing what is right to protect clients and team members alike from virus exposure.

February 5, 2021

A tax season note to our clients

During these continued uncertain and challenging times, we wanted to connect with our clients to manage expectations and to share important information early in this season. Our team has worked tirelessly over the past 10 months assisting clients through the COVID-19 economic crisis and the 2019 extended filing season. We continue to navigate and interpret guidance as it becomes available to take a proactive and meaningful approach with our clients’ needs. In this, the firm’s 50^th tax season, our commitment to quality remains key in the services we provide. Quality, in these times, coupled with prioritizing the health, safety and well-being of our clients, community, and team members, will take concentrated time and attention to ensure we are doing what is best for each client in light of the sweeping pandemic legislation enacted during 2020, and doing what is right to protect clients and team members alike from virus exposure.

Patience is key this filing season

Please expect that your return turnaround time will be longer than you may be accustomed to from year’s past. We are managing not only tax return workflow, but also a number of COVID-19 related services for clients that are time essential due to the passage of the December 2020 Consolidated Appropriations Act (CAA). You may also find that we are asking questions or requesting information that is different from year’s past. There are a number of new compliance related matters we are required to fulfill based on IRS regulations. We have requested that all individual clients complete the questions provided on pages 5-9 of their 2020 tax organizer to aid in these compliance requirements. If you did not receive your 2020 individual tax organizer, please contact our office.

As previously communicated, business clients (those filing Forms 1065, 1120, and 1120s) will be put on extension if return information is not received by February 19, 2021.

As previously communicated to our individual and trust clients (those filing Forms 1040 and 1041), if substantial information necessary to prepare your tax return is not received by March 31, 2021, your return will be placed on extension. Extensions may also require an accompanying tax payment to avoid penalties and interest on any tax balance due with the return.

If you know that you cannot meet these deadlines and will need to file for an extension, please let us know immediately. We appreciate in advance all efforts in providing us with 2020 tax information early in the season so that we can give the necessary time and attention to preparing accurate returns.

All of this to say, we are asking for patience, with the understanding, that we are doing the very best we can for each client relationship.

Protecting our team members and clients

We continue to follow strict protocols in the office to keep both our team members and clients safe.

While our firm remains open and available to serve client needs, as we found last tax season, we can manage the entire tax return preparation process in both virtual and contactless ways while still providing the level of service our clients have come to expect from the firm.

We are limiting face-to-face client appointments this season to Tuesdays and Thursdays to minimize the risks of COVID exposure. If you need to schedule a face-to-face appointment, please contact the office to schedule a time. We are offering virtual appointments through Zoom, FaceTime, or Microsoft Teams. These virtual appointments can also be scheduled by contacting the office.

For clients, business partners, and vendors traveling to our office, please do not travel to our office if you are sick, but instead allow us to offer electronic means to meet your needs. All clients, business partners, and vendors entering our office are required to wear a mask.

Electronic methods to provide tax information

We are well positioned to operate remotely through the use of secure technology.  We encourage clients and business partners to use the following additional options and ways to provide tax information to our firm:

o    All tax documents and relevant information can be uploaded by using the following secure link           in your web browser  https://www.clientaxcess.com/sharesafe/#/HottelandWillis

o   We can accept your e-file authorizations by the above link, e-mail, fax (540-662-1470) or mail. 

Our commitment to you

We care about the story behind the numbers and appreciate the continued support and confidence our clients have in what we do. We will continue to share information during the season as guidance evolves and changes. Please contact us with any questions as we continue to work in partnership together during these unprecedented times.

The IRS has released the 2021-2022 special per diem rates. Taxpayers use the per diem rates to substantiate certain expenses incurred while traveling away from home.

The IRS has released the 2021-2022 special per diem rates. Taxpayers use the per diem rates to substantiate certain expenses incurred while traveling away from home. These special per diem rates include:

1. the special transportation industry meal and incidental expenses (M&IE) rates;
2. the rate for the incidental expenses only deduction; and
3. the rates and list of high-cost localities for purposes of the high-low substantiation method.

Transportation Industry Special Per Diem Rates
The special M&IE rates for taxpayers in the transportation industry are:

• $69 for any locality of travel in the continental United States (CONUS); and
• $74 for any locality of travel outside the continental United States (OCONUS).

Incidental Expenses Only Rate
The rate is $5 per day for any CONUS or OCONUS travel for the incidental expenses only deduction.

High-Low Substantiation Method
For purposes of the high-low substantiation method, the 2021-2022 special per diem rates are:

• $296 for travel to any high-cost locality; and
• $202 for travel to any other locality within CONUS.

The amount treated as paid for meals is:

• $74 for travel to any high-cost locality; and
• $64 for travel to any other locality within CONUS.

Instead of the meal and incidental expenses only substantiation method, taxpayers may use:

• $74 for travel to any high-cost locality; and
• $64 for travel to any other locality within CONUS.

Taxpayers using the high-low method must comply with Rev. Proc. 2019-48, I.R.B. 2019-51, 1390. That procedure provides the rules for using a per diem rate to substantiate the amount of ordinary and necessary business expenses paid or incurred while traveling away from home.

The IRS and the Treasury Department have issued guidance to employers about reporting the amount of qualified sick and family leave wages paid to employees for leave taken in 2021 on Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement.

The IRS and the Treasury Department have issued guidance to employers about reporting the amount of qualified sick and family leave wages paid to employees for leave taken in 2021 on Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement. Further, the notice provides guidance under recent legislation, including: the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) ( P.L. 116-127), as amended by the COVID-Related Tax Relief Act of 2020 (Division N of P.L. 116-260) and the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 ( P.L. 117-2). Employers are required to report these amounts to employees either on Form W-2, Box 14, or in a separate statement provided with the Form W-2. The wage amount that the notice requires employers to report on Form W-2 will provide employees who are also self-employed with the information necessary to determine the amount of any sick and family leave equivalent credits they may claim in their self-employed capacities.

Reporting Requirements
The guidance requires eligible employers to report to employees the amount of qualified sick leave wages and qualified family leave wages paid to the employees under (i) sections 7001 or 7003 of the Families First Act for leave provided during the period beginning January 1, 2021, through March 31, 2021, and (ii) Code Secs. 3131 and 3132 for leave provided during the period beginning April 1, 2021, through September 30, 2021. Moreover, eligible employers have separate reporting requirements for (i) leave provided to employees during the period beginning January 1, 2021, through March 31, 2021, under the Families First Act; and (ii) leave provided to employees during the period beginning April 1, 2021, through September 30, 2021, under Code Secs. 3131 and 3132.

Specific Reporting Instructions
Qualified leave wages paid in 2021 under the Families First Act and Code Secs. 3131 and 3132 are to be reported in Box 1 of Form W-2. To the extent that qualified leave wages are social security wages or Medicare wages, they must also be included in Box 3 (up to the social security wage base) and Box 5, respectively.

In addition to the regular reporting requirements, employers must report the following types and amounts of the wages that were paid, with each amount separately reported either in Box 14 of Form W-2 or on a separate statement to the employee:

• the total amount of qualified sick leave wages paid for reasons described in paragraphs (1), (2), or (3) of section 5102(a) of the Emergency Paid Sick Leave Act (EPSLA) with respect to leave provided to employees during the period beginning on January 1, 2021, through March 31, 2021 (sick leave wages subject to the $511 per day limit);
• the total amount of qualified sick leave wages paid for reasons described in paragraphs (4), (5), or (6) of section 5102(a) of EPSLA with respect to leave provided to employees during the period beginning on January 1, 2021, through March 31, 2021 (sick leave wages subject to the $200 per day limit);
• the total amount of qualified family leave wages paid to the employee under the Emergency Family and Medical Leave Expansion Act (EFMLEA) with respect to leave provided to employees during the period beginning on January 1, 2021, through March 31, 2021;
• the total amount of qualified sick leave wages paid for reasons described in paragraphs (1), (2), or (3) of section 5102(a) of section 5102(a) of EPSLA with respect to leave provided to employees during the period beginning on April 1, 2021, through September 30, 2021;
• the total amount of qualified sick leave wages paid for reasons described in paragraphs (4), (5), or (6) of section 5102(a) of EPSLA with respect to leave provided to employees during the period beginning on April 1, 2021, through September 30, 2021;
• the total amount of qualified family leave wages paid to the employee under EFMLEA with respect to leave provided to employees during the period beginning on April 1, 2021, through September 30, 2021.

Model Language for Employee Instructions
As part of the Instructions for Employee, under the instructions for Box 14, for the Forms W-2, or in a separate statement sent to the employee, the employer may provide additional information about qualified sick leave wages and qualified family leave wages, and explain that these wages may limit the amount of the qualified sick leave equivalent or qualified family leave equivalent credits to which the employee may be entitled with respect to any self-employment income. The guidance provides model language for employee instructions.

Self-Employment Tax Reporting
If taxpayers have self-employment income in addition to wages paid by an employer, and they intend to claim any qualified sick leave or qualified family leave equivalent credits, they must report the qualified sick leave or qualified family leave wages on Form 7202, Credits for Sick Leave and Family Leave for Certain Self-Employed Individuals, included with their income tax return. The self-employed taxpayer may have to reduce (but not below zero) any qualified sick leave or qualified family leave equivalent amounts by these qualified leave wages.

The IRS has issued temporary and proposed regulations that authorize the assessment of any erroneous refund of the COVID-19 employment tax credits which were added by the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 ( P.L. 117-2). These credits for certain wages paid by employers are:

The IRS has issued temporary and proposed regulations that authorize the assessment of any erroneous refund of the COVID-19 employment tax credits which were added by the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 ( P.L. 117-2). These credits for certain wages paid by employers are:

• the Credit for Paid Sick Leave under Code Sec. 3131,
• the Credit for Paid Family Leave under Code Sec. 3132, and
• the Employee Retention Credit under Code Sec. 3134.

The text of the temporary regulations also serves as the text of the proposed regulations.

The temporary regulations apply to all credits under Code Secs. 3131 and 3132, including any increases to the credits under Code Sec. 3133, credited or refunded on or after April 1, 2021, including advanced refunds, as well as all credits under Code Sec. 3134 that are credited or refunded on or after July 1, 2021, including advanced refunds.

Erroneous Refunds
These credits are taken against the employer's share of Medicare tax imposed under Code Sec. 3111(b) and the attributable Railroad Retirement Tax Act tax imposed under Code Sec. 3221(a). If the amount of the credits exceeds these taxes for any calendar quarter, then the excess must be treated as an overpayment to be refunded or credited under Code Secs. 6402(a) and 6413(b). Any credits claimed that exceed the amount to which the employer is entitled, and that are actually credited or refunded by the IRS, are considered to be erroneous refunds of these credits.

If a small eligible employer specified in Code Sec. 3134(j)(2) receives excess advance payments of the credit, then the tax imposed under Code Sec. 3111(b) (or the attributable Code Sec. 3221(a) tax) for the calendar quarter are increased by the excess amount.

The temporary regulations provide that erroneous refunds of these credits are treated as underpayments of the taxes imposed under Code Sec. 3111(b) (and the attributable Code Sec. 3221(a) tax). The temporary regulations authorize the IRS to assess any credits erroneously credited, paid, or refunded in excess of the amount allowed as if those amounts were the applicable taxes, subject to assessment and administrative collection procedures. This allows the IRS to prevent the avoidance of the purposes of the limitations under the credit provisions, and to recover the erroneous refund amounts efficiently, while also preserving administrative protections afforded to taxpayers with respect to contesting their tax liabilities under the Code and avoiding unnecessary costs and burdens associated with litigation.

These assessment and administrative collection procedures do not replace the existing recapture methods, but instead represent an alternative method available to the IRS.

Any amount of the credits for qualified leave wages and certain collectively bargained contributions under Code Secs. 3131 and 3132, plus any amount of credits for qualified health plan expenses under Code Secs. 3131(d) and 3132(d), and including any increases in these credits under Code Sec. 3133, and any amount of the employee retention credit for qualified wages under Code Sec. 3134 that are erroneously refunded or credited to an employer must be treated as underpayments of the employer’s share of the applicable Medicare tax by the employer, and may be administratively assessed and collected in the same manner as the taxes. The temporary regulations provide that the determination of any amount of credits erroneously refunded must take into account any credit amounts advanced to an employer under the process established by the IRS.

In certain situations, third-party payors claim tax credits on behalf of their common law employer clients. The temporary regulations address this by providing that employers against which an erroneous refund of credits may be assessed as an underpayment include persons treated as the employer under Code Secs. 3401(d), 3504, and 3511, consistent with their liability for the employment taxes against which the credits applied.

Effective Date; Request for Comments
The temporary regulations are effective on the date they are published in the Federal Register.

A public hearing on the proposed regulations will be scheduled if requested in writing by any person who timely submits electronic or written comments. Written or electronic comments and requests for a public hearing must be received by the date that is 60 days after the proposed regulations are published in the Federal Register.

The IRS has announced that it intends to defer until 2023 the applicability of certain final regulations under Code Sec. 1446(a) and (f) relating to withholding of tax on foreign partners’ share of effectively connected income.

Withholding Provisions on Transfers of Interests in Publicly Traded Partnerships Deferred
The amendments will defer the applicability date to January 1, 2023, for certain provisions relating to (1) withholding under Code Sec. 1446(f) on transfers of interests in publicly traded partnerships ( "PTP interests"); (2) withholding under Code Sec. 1446(a) on distributions made with respect to PTP interests; and (3) withholding under Code Sec. 1446(f)(4) by partnerships on distributions to transferees.

Code Sec. 864(c)(8) generally provides that gain or loss derived by a foreign person on the sale or exchange of an interest in a partnership engaged in a U.S. trade or business is treated as effectively connected gain or loss and, therefore, is subject to U.S. tax. Code Sec. 1446(f)(1) generally requires a transferee of an interest in a partnership to withhold 10 percent of the amount realized if any portion of the gain on the disposition would be treated under Code Sec. 864(c)(8) as effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States. Code Sec. 1446(f)(4) provides that if a transferee fails to withhold on the disposition as required under Code Sec. 1446(f)(1), the partnership must withhold on distributions to the transferee.

Taxpayers May Rely on Deferral Prior to Amendments
The final foreign partner withholding regulations were published on November 30, 2020, in T.D. 9926, I.R.B. 2020-51, 1602, and the provisions whose applicability dates the amendments will defer generally would have applied to transfers and distributions that occur on or after January 1, 2022. Taxpayers may rely on the deferrals announced in the notice prior to amendments being issued.

The IRS has reminded taxpayers to file their 2020 tax returns by the upcoming October 15, 2021 due date. Taxpayers must file on or before the extension deadline to avoid the penalty for filing late if they request an extension. Tax returns can still be filed through electronic filing options, such as the IRS Free File.

The IRS has reminded taxpayers to file their 2020 tax returns by the upcoming October 15, 2021 due date. Taxpayers must file on or before the extension deadline to avoid the penalty for filing late if they request an extension. Tax returns can still be filed through electronic filing options, such as the IRS Free File.

However, the following taxpayers may have more time to file their returns:

• members of the military and others serving in a combat zone as they have 180 days after they leave the combat zone to file returns and pay any taxes due, and
• taxpayers in federally declared disaster areas who already had valid extensions.

Taxpayers are usually not penalized for failure to file if a refund is due. However, people risk losing the refund if they wait too long to file and claim a refund. Taxpayers can avoid additional penalties and interest by filing the 2020 return as soon as possible and paying any taxes owed.

Taxpayers must remember the following while paying federal taxes electronically:

• electronic payment options are the best way to make a tax payment,
• payment can be made when taxpayers file electronically using tax software online,
• IRS Direct Pay permits taxpayers to directly pay online from a checking or savings account for free and to schedule payments up to 365 days in advance,
• taxpayers can pay with a credit card, debit card or digital wallet option through a payment processor, which would charge a fee for the transfer,
• the IRS2Go app provides mobile-friendly payment options, including Direct Pay and debit or credit card payments on mobile devices, and
• payment can be made conveniently using the Electronic Federal Tax Payment System Voice Response System.

Further, taxpayers can see the following information while preparing their tax return or following up on balances or notices through their online account:

• adjusted gross income,
• economic impact payment amounts,
• estimated tax payment amounts,
• amount owed for any past years, updated for the current calendar day,
• payment history and any scheduled or pending payments,
• payment plan details,
• digital copies of select notices from the IRS, and
• approve or reject authorization requests from tax professional

Direct Deposit for Refunds
Taxpayers must file electronically and have their refund electronically deposited into their bank or other financial accounts for safe and quick refund receipt. Taxpayers can use direct deposit to deposit their refund into one or more accounts or purchase U.S. Savings Bonds. People can visit the FDIC website or the National Credit Union Association to use their Credit Union Locator Tool for information on opening an online bank or credit union account if they do not have a bank account. Further, veterans can use the Veterans Benefits Banking Program (VBBP) to access financial services at participating banks.

Monthly Advance Child Tax Credit Payments
The IRS is using previous year tax information, 2019 for most, for determination of the credit amount for those eligible and on extension for their 2020 tax returns. People who request an extension must file as soon as possible if they experience a significant change like the birth of a child in 2020. The IRS can calculate the credit based on the 2020 return and pay it out in total over the remaining months in 2021 once that return is processed.

Taxpayers may be eligible for two payments of half the credit in 2021 if they file and have their 2020 return processed on or before November 1, 2021. Similarly, people may be eligible for one payment if they file and have their return processed on or before November 29, 2021. The IRS has encouraged taxpayers to file electronically for quick processing of returns and to avoid delays.

Claiming Missing Stimulus Payments
To claim missing stimulus payments, eligible people must file a 2020 tax return or use the Child Tax Credit Non-filer Sign-up Tool soon, even if they usually do not file. The IRS will also automatically evaluate the taxpayer’s eligibility for the third economic impact payment when the 2020 return is processed. It will continue to issue eligible taxpayers their third economic impact payment and plus-up payments through the end of 2021.

The IRS has reminded taxpayers to develop emergency preparedness plans due to the upcoming hurricane season and the ongoing threat of wildfires in some parts of the country. September is declared as the National Preparedness Month.

The IRS has reminded taxpayers to develop emergency preparedness plans due to the upcoming hurricane season and the ongoing threat of wildfires in some parts of the country. September is declared as the National Preparedness Month.

Further, the IRS advised taxpayers to:

• secure critical documents such as tax returns, birth certificates, deeds, titles and insurance policies inside waterproof containers in a secure space;
• duplicate and scan key documents for backup storage on electronic media such as a flash drive, CD or in the cloud, which provide security and easy portability;
• record all property, especially expensive and high value items. The IRS disaster-loss workbooks in Publication 584 and Publication 584-B can help individuals and businesses compile lists of belongings or business equipment;
• employers who use payroll service providers should check payroll service provider’s fiduciary bonds as they could protect the employer in the event of default by the provider;
• employers should create an Electronic Federal Tax Payment System account at EFTPS.gov to monitor their payroll tax deposits and receive email alerts; and
• reconstruct records after a disaster for tax purposes, getting federal assistance or insurance reimbursement. Further, taxpayers who have lost some or all their records during a disaster can visit the IRS's Reconstructing Records webpage.

In addition, taxpayers residing in a federally declared disaster can check for the available disaster tax relief on the IRS Tax Relief in Disaster Situations webpage or Around the Nation on IRS.gov. The IRS automatically identifies taxpayers located in the covered disaster area and applies filing and payment relief. Taxpayers impacted by a disaster can contact the IRS at 866-562-5227 to speak with an IRS specialist trained to handle disaster-related issues. Further, taxpayers impacted by a disaster outside of a federally declared disaster area may qualify for disaster relief. This includes taxpayers who are not physically located in a disaster area but their records essential for filing or payment deadlines postponed during the relief period are located in a covered disaster area.

The IRS has emphasized the importance of correctly determining whether the individuals providing services to businesses were employees or independent contractors.

The IRS has emphasized the importance of correctly determining whether the individuals providing services to businesses were employees or independent contractors. Generally, an employee performs services that businesses control. Independent contractors offer their services to the public. Businesses have a right to control the details of the services performed.

The classification depends on the:

• company’s behavioral Control on what the worker does and how the job is performed;
• business’ direct or control the financial and business aspects of the worker; and
• relationship of the Parties ascertained by written contracts or employee type benefits.

Misclassification of Workers
Businesses could be held liable for employment taxes if an employee is misclassified without a reasonable basis.

Workers can use Form 8919, Uncollected Social Security and Medicare Tax on Wages, to figure and report their share of uncollected taxes due on their compensation if they believe they have been improperly classified as independent contractors

Voluntary Classification Settlement Program
Taxpayers can reclassify their workers as employees for future tax periods for eligible taxpayers that agree to treat their workers as employees through the Voluntary Classification Settlement Program. Taxpayers must fulfill eligibility requirements, apply by filing Form 8952, Application for Voluntary Classification Settlement Program, and enter into a closing agreement with the IRS.

Self-employed individuals must file an annual tax return and pay estimated tax quarterly. They pay self-employment tax (Social Security and Medicare tax) and income tax. If self-employed individuals use part of business home, they may claim the home office deduction.

Gig Economy
Taxpayers must report gig economy income on a tax return even if the income is part-time, temporary or side work; not reported on a Form 1099-K, 1099-MISC, W-2 or other income statements; or paid in any form, including cash, property, goods or virtual currency.

The IRS has allowed taxpayers to use electronic or digital signatures on certain paper forms they cannot file electronically.

The IRS has allowed taxpayers to use electronic or digital signatures on certain paper forms they cannot file electronically. The Service has balanced the e-signature option with critical security and protection needed against identity theft and fraud. The IRS will accept a wide range of electronic signatures. Acceptable electronic signature methods include:

• a typed name typed on a signature block;
• a scanned or digitized image of a handwritten signature that’s attached to an electronic record;
• a handwritten signature input onto an electronic signature pad;
• a handwritten signature, mark or command input on a display screen with a stylus device; and
• a signature created by a third-party software.

Moreover, the IRS will accept images of signatures (scanned or photographed) including common file types supported by Microsoft 365 such as tiff, jpg, jpeg, pdf, Microsoft Office Suite, or Zip.

The IRS has allowed taxpayers and representatives to use electronic or digital signatures on paper forms, which they cannot file using IRS e-file, including for example:

• Form 11-C, Occupational Tax and Registration Return for Wagering;
• Form 637, Application for Registration (For Certain Excise Tax Activities);
• Form 706, U.S. Estate (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return and other forms in the 706 series;
• Form 709, U.S. Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return;
• Form 730, Monthly Tax Return for Wagers;
• Form 1066, U.S. Income Tax Return for Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit;
• Form 1120-C, U.S. Income Tax Return for Cooperative Associations and other forms in the 1120 series;
• Form 3520, Annual Return To Report Transactions With Foreign Trusts and Receipt of Certain Foreign Gifts; and
• Form 3520-A, Annual Information Return of Foreign Trust With a U.S. Owner.

The Tax Court had jurisdiction to determine the appropriate relief available to an individual who sought innocent spouse relief for two tax years at issue. Initially, the taxpayer submitted a request for innocent spouse relief for one tax year, which the IRS denied in a final determination.

The Tax Court had jurisdiction to determine the appropriate relief available to an individual who sought innocent spouse relief for two tax years at issue. Initially, the taxpayer submitted a request for innocent spouse relief for one tax year, which the IRS denied in a final determination. Subsequently, the taxpayer filed an untimely petition for Tax Court review which was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Later, the taxpayer submitted a request for innocent spouse relief for an additional tax year at issue (two tax years). The IRS issued a final determination denying relief as to both years on the merits. The Tax Court held it had jurisdiction to hear the case even though the IRS previously denied relief for one year and argued that the year was included in the notice by mistake.

Notice Is Evaluated on its Face
The Tax Court has jurisdiction to review a final determination denying innocent spouse relief. The Tax Court concluded that when evaluating whether a notice serves as the predicate for jurisdiction, it generally does not look beyond the face of the notice unless its text is ambiguous or inconsistent. In this case, the notice unambiguously denied relief for two years. The court also stated that nothing in the law or regulations prohibits the Commissioner from issuing more than one final determination as to a given tax year. Thus, the notice could be a final determination conferring jurisdiction, even though there had been a prior final determination.

The Senate has approved a bipartisan IRS reform bill, which now heads to President Trump’s desk. Trump is expected to sign the bill into law.

The Senate has approved a bipartisan IRS reform bill, which now heads to President Trump’s desk. Trump is expected to sign the bill into law.

The reworked Taxpayer First Act ( HR 3151) cleared the Senate on the evening of June 13. The revamped measure had been approved unanimously in the House on June 10.

"After years of good-faith, bipartisan work, our IRS reforms are finally going to become law," House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard Neal, D-Mass., and ranking member Kevin Brady, R-Tex., said in a joint statement. "In this historic legislation, we focused on putting taxpayers first."

Likewise, Senate Finance Committee (SFC) Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, praised the passage of the bipartisan, bicameral IRS reform bill. "It’s a big first step toward strengthening taxpayer protections and turning the IRS into the customer service organization it ought to be," Grassley said in a statement. "I look forward to President Trump signing it into law so the IRS can begin implementing long overdue reforms that will put taxpayers first," he added.

Reworked Bill

The reworked IRS reform bill, originally introduced in the last Congress, was revised earlier in June after the House passed a prior version in April. However, the original House-approved Taxpayer First bill (HR 1957) was deemed doomed in the Senate by May because of recent controversy surrounding the IRS’s Free File program. Thus, the provision codifying the Free File program was stripped from the original bill; the measure was reintroduced as HR 3151. It then quickly cleared each chamber.

Service Improvements

Generally, the Taxpayer First Act aims to reform the IRS for the first time in 20 years to better meet the needs of taxpayers. It requires the IRS to develop a comprehensive customer service strategy, as well as a plan to redesign its structure, modernize its technology, and enhance its cyber security. In addition, the new law will:

• waive the application fee for an offer in compromise (OIC) by a low-income taxpayer;

• clarify information available about low-income taxpayer clinics (LITCs);

• codify the Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) Program;

• require notice regarding the closure of taxpayer assistance centers (TACs);

• improve the IRS whistleblower program; and

• modify the private debt collection program.

Identity Protection

The legislation includes a number of provisions to help protect taxpayers from tax ID theft and improve taxpayer interaction with the IRS should they become a victim. For example, the IRS must provide a single point of contact for victims of identity theft, notification of suspected identity theft, and guidelines for stolen identity refund fraud cases.

The IRS is required to expand its current program that allows victims of tax ID theft to obtain a personalized PIN. Any individual must be allowed to request an identity protection personal identification number (IP PIN) to confirm a taxpayer’s identity on tax returns.

Electronic Filing

The IRS reform bill directly impacts taxpayers and other persons by reducing the threshold for filing electronically from 250 or more returns during the year. The threshold is 100 or more returns for 2021, and 10 or more return after 2021. The IRS can waive the e-file requirement for tax return preparers in areas with limited internet access.

E-filing requirements are also extended to all tax-exempt organizations that file returns or statements, regardless of amount of assets, gross receipts, or number of returns to be filed. In addition, the IRS is directed to develop an internet portal to allow taxpayers to file series Form 1099, similar to the portal used to file series Form W-2 with the Social Security Administration.

Other Electronic Services

To help increase the use of electronic services, the IRS must publish within six months uniform standards for accepting electronic signatures on requests for disclosure of taxpayer information (Forms 2848, 4506-T, and 8821). It must also limit the redisclosure of return information by a designee to only those expressly consented to by the taxpayer.

The new law increases the penalty for improper disclosure or use of information by return preparers. It also puts new limits on access to returns and return information by non-IRS employees.

Overall, the IRS must develop procedures to authenticate users of its suite of electronic services, to prevent tax refund fraud. Included in these services, the IRS must develop an automated version of its Income Verification Express Service (IVES) for third-parties.

Planning Note: The legislation also allows the IRS to accept credit and debit card payments for the payment of taxes directly, as opposed to through a third party. In addition, the IRS must establish procedures for taxpayers to report misdirected deposits of refunds.

Other Changes

Additional changes made by the Taxpayer First Act include:

• clarifying procedures for equitable relief from joint liability;

• establish new safeguards on the seizure of funds believed to be structured to avoid the $10,000 financial reporting requirement; and

• modify procedures for the issuance of summons and notice of third party contacts by the IRS.

To help pay for these changes, the minimum penalty for failure to file returns is increased after 2019 to the lesser of $330 (indexed for inflation) or 100 percent of the amount required to be shown on the return.

The IRS has issued final regulations that require taxpayers to reduce the amount any charitable contribution deduction by the amount of any state and local tax (SALT) credit they receive or expect to receive in return. The rules are aimed at preventing taxpayers from getting around the SALT deduction limits. A safe harbor has also been provided to certain individuals to treat any disallowed charitable contribution deduction under this rule as a deductible payment of taxes under Code Sec. 164. The final regulations and the safe harbor apply to charitable contribution payments made after August 27, 2018.

The IRS has issued final regulations that require taxpayers to reduce the amount any charitable contribution deduction by the amount of any state and local tax (SALT) credit they receive or expect to receive in return. The rules are aimed at preventing taxpayers from getting around the SALT deduction limits. A safe harbor has also been provided to certain individuals to treat any disallowed charitable contribution deduction under this rule as a deductible payment of taxes under Code Sec. 164. The final regulations and the safe harbor apply to charitable contribution payments made after August 27, 2018.

SALT Limit

An individual’s itemized deduction of SALT taxes is limited to $10,000 ($5,000 if married filing separately) for tax years beginning after 2017. Some states and local governments have adopted laws that allowed individuals to receive a state tax credit for contributions to certain charitable funds. These laws are aimed at getting around the SALT deduction limit by creating a charitable deduction for federal income tax purposes. Regardless of state and local law, however, federal law controls when determining charitable deductions for federal income tax purposes.

Return Benefit

The final regulations generally adopt the rule in proposal regulations ( NPRM REG-112176-18) that the receipt of a SALT credit for a charitable contribution is the receipt of a return benefit (quid pro quo benefit). If a taxpayer makes a payment or transfers property to Code Sec. 170(c) entity, he or she must reduce any charitable contribution deduction for federal income tax purposes if he or she receives or expects to receive a SALT credit in return. A taxpayer is generally is not required to reduce the charitable deduction on account of its receipt of state or local tax deductions. However, the taxpayer must reduce its charitable deduction if it receives or expects to receive state or local tax deductions in excess of the taxpayer’s payment or the fair market value of property transferred.

De Minimis Exception

The final regulations retain the de minimis exception that a taxpayer’s charitable deduction is not reduced if the SALT credits received as a return benefit do not exceed 15 percent of the taxpayer’s charitable payment. The 15-percent exception applies only if the sum of the taxpayer SALT credit received or excepted to receive does not exceed 15 percent of the taxpayer’s payment or of the fair market value of the property transferred.

Safe Harbor

The IRS has also issued Notice 2019-12 providing a safe harbor for certain individuals if any portion of a charitable contribution deduction disallowed due to the receipt of a SALT credit. Under the safe harbor, any disallowed portion of the charitable deduction may be treated as the payment of SALT taxes for the purposes of deducting taxes under Code Sec. 164.

Eligible taxpayers can use the safe harbor to determine their SALT deduction on their tax-year 2018 return. Those who have already filed may be able to claim a greater SALT deduction by filing an amended return if they have not already claimed the $10,000 maximum amount ($5,000 if married filing separately).

Republicans’ 2017 overhaul of the tax code created a new 20-percent deduction of qualified business income (QBI), subject to certain limitations, for pass-through entities (sole proprietorships, partnerships, limited liability companies, or S corporations). The controversial QBI deduction—also called the "pass-through" deduction—has remained an ongoing topic of debate among lawmakers, tax policy experts, and stakeholders.

Republicans’ 2017 overhaul of the tax code created a new 20-percent deduction of qualified business income (QBI), subject to certain limitations, for pass-through entities (sole proprietorships, partnerships, limited liability companies, or S corporations). The controversial QBI deduction—also called the "pass-through" deduction—has remained an ongoing topic of debate among lawmakers, tax policy experts, and stakeholders.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97), enacted at the end of 2017, created the new Section 199A QBI deduction for noncorporate taxpayers, effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. However, under current law the QBI deduction will sunset after 2025. In addition to the QBI deduction’s impermanence, its complexity and ambiguous statutory language have created many questions for taxpayers and practitioners.

The IRS first released much-anticipated proposed regulations for the new QBI deduction, REG-107892-18, on August 8, 2018. The proposed regulations were published in the Federal Register on August 16, 2018. The IRS released the final regulations and notice of additional proposed rulemaking on January 18, 2019, followed by a revised version of the final regulations on February 1, 2019. Additionally, Rev. Proc. 2019-11 was issued concurrently to provide further guidance on the definition of wages. Also, a proposed revenue procedure, Notice 2019-7, was issued concurrently to provide a safe harbor under which certain rental real estate enterprises may be treated as a trade or business for purposes of Section 199A.

Wolters Kluwer recently interviewed Tom West, a principal in the passthroughs group of the Washington National Tax practice of KPMG LLP, about the Section 199A QBI deduction regulations. Notably, West formerly served as tax legislative counsel at the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Tax Policy. This article represents the views of the author only and does not necessarily represent the views or professional advice of KPMG LLP.

Wolters Kluwer: What is your general overview of the revised, final regulations for the Section 199A Qualified Business Income (QBI) or "pass-through" deduction?

Tom West: I think it is admirable that Treasury and IRS were able to publish these final regulations so quickly and address so many of the comments and questions that the proposed regulations generated. I think they realized how important this particular package was to so many taxpayers for the 2018 filing season and, while questions obviously remain, having these rules out in time to inform decisions for this year’s tax returns is helpful. In particular, the liberalized aggregation rules and the additional examples regarding certain specified service trades or businesses (SSTBs) are the most consequential in my mind.

Wolters Kluwer: What should taxpayers and practitioners keep in mind in consideration of relying on either the proposed or final regulations for the 2018 tax year?

Tom West: I have to imagine that when choosing between the two, for most taxpayers the final regulations will ultimately provide the better result. The ability to aggregate at the entity level, which was only provided in the final regulations, may be a key consideration for those taxpayers with more complicated or tiered structures. That said, I do think taxpayers need to be careful in their aggregation modeling because you are going to be stuck with your aggregation once you’ve filed. It may be that some taxpayers wait on getting locked into a particular aggregation and continue to study the new rules—and even wait on additional guidance that may be coming. However, it may be important to note that the final regulations provide that if an individual fails to aggregate, the individual may not aggregate trades or businesses on an amended return—other than for the 2018 tax year.

Wolters Kluwer: How is the removal of the proposed 80 percent rule regarding specified service trades or businesses (SSTBs) from the final regulations likely to impact certain taxpayers?

Tom West: First of all, I think the removal of this rule is a demonstration of two important dynamics. One, the critical importance of the engagement of taxpayers in the comment process, and, two, the government’s willingness to listen and adapt in their rule-making. I don’t know if there are particular industries or taxpayers who will be impacted, but I do know that the change is a very logical and appropriate one, and logic doesn’t always prevail in these processes, so I’m happy to give the regulators credit when it does.

Wolters Kluwer: Which industries may have been helped or hindered by the final regulations with respect to SSTB rules?

Tom West: I’m not sure specific industries were helped, but the biggest positive in terms of the SSTB final rules is the carryover from the proposed regulations of the treatment of the skill or reputation provision. Had Treasury and the IRS gone in a different direction, there was a risk of that provision swallowing the rest of the 199A regime—not to mention how much more subjective the already sometimes difficult SSTB determinations would have become.

Wolters Kluwer: Are there any lingering, unanswered questions among taxpayers or practitioners that particularly stand out when determining what constitutes SSTB income?

Tom West: I think many taxpayers who have both SSTB and non-SSTB activities were hoping for more clarity, either in rules or examples, on how to acceptably segregate business lines or on when (or if) certain activities are inextricably tied together. There are also still lingering questions regarding when a trade or business is an SSTB—particularly in the field of health.

Wolters Kluwer: Were there any surprises in the final regulations?

Tom West: I don’t know if I’m surprised, knowing the concerns that led them to the decisions they made, but the fact that Treasury and IRS held the line on some of the SSTB-related rules is notable. I’m thinking specifically of the so-called "cliff" effect of the de minimis rule and the fact that owners of certain kinds of SSTB businesses, e.g., sports teams, are not allowed to benefit from the Section 199A deduction.

Republicans’ 2017 overhaul of the tax code created a new 20-percent deduction of qualified business income (QBI), subject to certain limitations, for pass-through entities (sole proprietorships, partnerships, limited liability companies, or S corporations). The controversial QBI deduction—also called the "pass-through" deduction—has remained an ongoing topic of debate among lawmakers, tax policy experts, and stakeholders.

Republicans’ 2017 overhaul of the tax code created a new 20-percent deduction of qualified business income (QBI), subject to certain limitations, for pass-through entities (sole proprietorships, partnerships, limited liability companies, or S corporations). The controversial QBI deduction—also called the "pass-through" deduction—has remained an ongoing topic of debate among lawmakers, tax policy experts, and stakeholders.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97), enacted at the end of 2017, created the new Section 199A QBI deduction for noncorporate taxpayers, effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. However, under current law the QBI deduction will sunset after 2025. In addition to the QBI deduction’s impermanence, its complexity and ambiguous statutory language have created many questions for taxpayers and practitioners.

The IRS first released much-anticipated proposed regulations for the new QBI deduction, REG-107892-18, on August 8, 2018. The proposed regulations were published in the Federal Register on August 16, 2018. The IRS released the final regulations and notice of additional proposed rulemaking on January 18, 2019, followed by a revised version of the final regulations on February 1, 2019. Additionally, Rev. Proc. 2019-11, I.R.B. 2019-9, 742, was issued concurrently to provide further guidance on the definition of wages. Also, a proposed Revenue Procedure, Notice 2019-7, I.R.B. 2019-9, 740, was issued, concurrently providing a safe harbor under which certain rental real estate enterprises may be treated as a trade or business for purposes of Section 199A.

Wolters Kluwer recently interviewed Tom West, a principal in the passthroughs group of the Washington National Tax practice of KPMG LLP, about the Section 199A QBI deduction regulations. Notably, West formerly served as tax legislative counsel at the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Tax Policy. This article represents the views of the author only and does not necessarily represent the views or professional advice of KPMG LLP.

Wolters Kluwer: Neither the proposed nor final regulations for Section 199A give guidance as to when rental real estate activity constitutes a Section 162 trade or business. How might the application of the safe harbor provided for in IRS Notice 2019-7 offer taxpayers clarity? And how might failure to qualify for the safe harbor impact the determination of whether the rental activity is a trade or business under Section 199A?

Tom West: The safe harbor is helpful but it appears to be intended for relatively smaller taxpayers who may have had questions about their activities rising to the level of a trade or business. I don’t think falling outside of the safe harbor is dispositive—especially in light of the recent policy statement from Treasury regarding sub-regulatory guidance.

Wolters Kluwer: Can you speak to the some of the complexity that may be involved in tax planning with respect to achieving the right balance between adequate W-2 wages and QBI?

Tom West: Other than for small taxpayers, there is only a benefit under Section 199A if the limitations are met. It does not do any good to have QBI but then have insufficient W-2 wages and qualified property to meet the limitations. So when taxpayers are evaluating what constitutes a qualified trade or business (or whether to aggregate qualified trades or businesses) they will need to determine the amount of W-2 wages with respect to each QTB. Aligning the W-2 wages with the QTB will be important—but the salary expense will also result in a reduction in the amount of QBI and therefore the amount of any Section 199A benefit—so modeling becomes critical. Consideration should also be given to any collateral consequences—for instance the impact of the alignment on allocation and apportionment for state taxes.

Wolters Kluwer: According to a March 18, 2019, Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) report, Reference Number: 2019-44-022, IRS management indicated that the timeline related to the issuance of Section 199A guidance did not provide enough time for the IRS to develop a QBI deduction tax form. Although the IRS did create a worksheet, do you have a prediction on what key elements may be included on the new form once released?

Tom West: I do think that worksheets could be developed that would facilitate the reporting of Section 199A information—particularly through tiered structures—so as to ease the reporting burden and enhance compliance.

Wolters Kluwer: The IRS has estimated that nearly 23.7 million taxpayers may be eligible to claim the Section 199A deduction and that more than 22.2 million (94 percent) of those eligible taxpayers will not require a complex calculation for the deduction. What notable differences do you expect there are between "complex" and the majority of calculations?

Tom West: For taxpayers under the Section 199A income thresholds ($157.5K single, $315K joint), the deduction is very easy to calculate and claim. Those taxpayers don’t need to worry about being in an SSTB, how much wages they paid, or the basis of their property. Once those taxpayers hit those income thresholds though, even in the phase-out range, things very quickly get complex—and that’s as a consequence of the statute; it is not something that the regulators can change.

Wolters Kluwer: Do you anticipate the IRS will issue further guidance on the Section 199A deduction?

Tom West: I do. As I said at the top, I think part of the government’s motivation in finalizing these regulations so quickly was providing guidance to taxpayers ahead of the tax-filing season. And while for the majority of taxpayers who are below the 199A cap there is probably now sufficient guidance, I think there are still a lot of questions for those with more complex situations. Given the number of taxpayers who are eligible for this deduction, and the importance of Section 199A as the big benefit to non-corporate businesses in what the Administration views as a signature legislative achievement, I have to believe that the government will be responsive to taxpayers’ requests for additional help on this provision. However, given that the provision is due to sunset, it will be important that any guidance is forthcoming in fairly short order to be of any usefulness to taxpayers.

Wolters Kluwer: At this time, do you have any recommendations for taxpayers and practitioners moving forward?

Tom West: As people are going through their tax filings this year, I’d keep a list of issues, questions, and areas where additional guidance would be helpful. It often happens that problems with new legislation or regulations don’t reveal themselves until taxpayers have to put pencil to paper and track their real-world numbers through returns. We’ll all have that experience this year and, with those lists of issues and questions in hand, there may be an opportunity to approach the IRS and Treasury in the hopes of getting resolution going forward. Keeping that list could also help identify areas for tax planning and perhaps ease the complexity of filing for 2019.